Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Buckley et al v. Norlite, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Peter Buckley and Amy Buckley Harlow
Defendant:
Norlite, LLC, Tradebe Environmental Services, LLC and Tradebe Treatment and Recycling Northeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harlow v. Jones
as 9:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
Darrell Harlow
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harlow v. Heard et al
as 5:2018cv01239
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Agency and Allen Rebecca Heard
Plaintiff:
Darell Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harlow v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2018cv01215
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #1, Frank Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
Darell Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harlow v. St. Andrews et al
as 9:2018cv00648
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sgt. St. Andrews, Sgt. Pamela Witek and others
Plaintiff:
Darell Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combier v. Portelos et al
as 1:2017cv02239
Defendant:
Lucio Celli, Carmen Farina, Bryan Glass and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Combier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Broccoli v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2015cv05829
Plaintiff:
Raymond Broccoli
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, N.Y., John Doe, Harlowe Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harlow-Pollard Watts v. Crothall Healthcare Inc.
as 1:2014cv05851
Defendant:
Crothall Healthcare Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Harlow-Pollard Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harlow v. Cowin et al
as 9:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Darell Harlow
Defendant:
Timothy Cowin, Vorndran and Kessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
