Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shirley v. Sunrise Carrier, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Laney Shirley
Defendant:
Sunrise Carrier, Inc. and Harman Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02418
Plaintiff:
Harman Singh
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
KAUR et al v. KELLENBERGER et al
as 1:2020cv01432
Defendant:
SEAN KELLENBERGER, STEVEN OCHOCKI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
HARMAN SINGH and HARINDER KAUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tarlok Bansal, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72273
Petitioner:
TARLOK SINGH BANSAL, AKA Tarlochan Singh Bansal, AKA Gurlochan Singh, JASBIR KAUR, JATINDER SINGH and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Altamura v. Ontario Limited TBN Transport et al
as 1:2015cv03915
Plaintiff:
Meagan Altamura
Defendant:
Harman Singh Kalra and Ontario Limited TBN Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tarlok Bansal, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-74040
Petitioner:
TARLOK SINGH BANSAL, aka Tarlochan Singh Bansal Gurlochan Singh, JASBIR KAUR, JATINDER SINGH and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Acting Attorney General
Tarlok Bansal, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70027
Petitioner:
TARLOK SINGH BANSAL, aka Tarlochan Singh Bansal Gurlochan Singh, JASBIR KAUR, JATINDER SINGH and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tarlok Bansal, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73540
Petitioner:
TARLOK SINGH BANSAL, aka Tarlochan Singh Bansal Gurlochan Singh, JASBIR KAUR, JATINDER SINGH and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Acting Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
