Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Pollock v. Clarke
as 2:2016cv00394
Petitioner:
Maurice Pollock
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2014cv05524
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Bernard Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keenum v. Clarke et al
as 3:2013cv05688
Plaintiff:
Richard Keenum
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Bernie Warner, Teachout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warner et al
as 2:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Eldon Vail, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Warner et al
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
Scott W McDonald
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Jane Doe Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2011cv05117
Plaintiff:
Leopold Cardenas
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Harold Clarke, Duenich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gronquist v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2010cv05374
Plaintiff:
Derek E. Gronquist
Defendant:
Faye Nicholas , Heather Annis , Paul Pemberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv05010
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Rob McKenna, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horsley v. Washington State et al
as 3:2009cv05680
Plaintiff:
Roddy Horsley
Defendant:
Washington State, Department of Corrections, Stafford Creek Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv05622
Plaintiff:
Mark K Tolson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
