Cases 11 - 20 of 551
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6955
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RAGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, JEFFERY ARTRIP, Warden and CHADWICK DOTSON
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 23-6934
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6929
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Tariq Amin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6933
Petitioner / Appellant:
TARIQ RASHAD AMIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Demmerick Brown v. T. Coyner
as 23-6888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY COYNER, Dental Assistant, WERNER WIEDEMANN, Dentist, K. SMITH, Institutional Physician and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Phoenix v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6803
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the VADOC, DR. MARK AMONETTE, Chief Medical Director, J.D. OATES, Deerfield Asst. Warden and others
Demond White v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6765
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Gary Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6745
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Robert Via, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6732
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA-DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
