Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Seguro Medico, LLC dba Quick Health v. Suffolk Administrative Services, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Seguro Medico, LLC doing business as Quick Health
Defendant:
Suffolk Administrative Services, LLC, Hawaii Mainland Administrators, LLC, Data Marketing Partnership, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS v. HAWAII MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
as 2:2022cv06918
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS
Defendant:
HAWAII MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Livia Scotto v. USA, et al
as 22-3247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONATHAN BEATTY, MICHAEL DUNLAP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Livia Scotto v. Maimonides, et al
as 22-3136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAUL EWING and others
PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS, LLC v. DMW MARINE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03671
Plaintiff:
PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
DMW MARINE GROUP, LLC and DOUGLAS M. WEIDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCOTTO v. MAIMONIDES et al
as 2:2022cv03626
Plaintiff:
LIVIA SCOTTO
Defendant:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN LEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTTO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2022cv03434
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JONATHAN BEATTY, MICHAEL DUNLAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
