Cases 41 - 50 of 103
MITCHELL v. JACKS et al
as 1:2015cv01990
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
IMAN JACKS, LASHEEKA R. DIXON, ALFRED L. HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALLEN et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALLEN , LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ-SOTO , STEVEN SMALLWOOD and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, BRIAN HAWKINS, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Isreal Hawkins, Jr. v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
Isreal Owen Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause of Action v. IRS
as 15-5026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cause of Action
Defendant - Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service
Movant - Appellant:
Isreal Owen Hawkins, Jr.
HAWKINS, JR. v. HOLDER
as 1:2015cv00066
Petitioner:
ISREAL OWEN HAWKINS, JR.
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. CAPITOL PETROLEUM GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Defendant:
CAPITOL PETROLEUM GROUP, LLC and DEREK GRAYER
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE D. HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ABDULLAH v. DREW et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA ABDULLAH
Defendant:
DREW, HAWKINS, DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: In The Matter of the Fort v. WMATA
as 13-7129
In Re:
In re: In The Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising out of the Events of June 22, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Davonne Flanagan, Dawn Flanagan, Imhotep Yakub and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and WPCompany, LLC, doing business as Was, doing business as The Washington Post
Defendant - Appellant:
Arinc, Inc. and Alstom Signaling, Inc.
Hazel Hawkins v. Sari Kurland
as 13-7127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hazel Hawkins
Defendant - Appellee:
Sari Kurland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
