Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00689
Plaintiff:
Joey V. Hawkins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edwards v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Edwards
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl C. Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drumgo v. Brown et al
as 1:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
De Shawn Drumgo
Defendant:
Reginald Brown, Thompson, James Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gattis v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Robert Gattis
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Delaware Correctional Center, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hawkins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Petitioner:
Donnie R. Hawkins
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Runyon v. Biden et al
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, III, Paul Wallace, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Thomas Carroll, David Pierce, David Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
