Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Marie Ballerini-Hougnon, Donald Carroll and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken, Department of State, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. Elephant Insurance Services, LLC
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Jamila Harris and Brittany Hawkins
Defendant:
Elephant Insurance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown et al v. Leu et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
James W Brown, Matthew J Collins, Michael Vasquez and others
Defendant:
D. Leu, D. Smith, R. Carmona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Faison et al
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jesus F. Flores
Defendant:
Faison, Hawkins, Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Gregory
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Miss. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hawkins v. Scott
as 3:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Judge Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickral v. Burns et al
as 3:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
Lindsay M. Pickral
Defendant:
Esquire Stephen D. Burns, Brad Ellis Hawkins, Moen Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DaSilva v. Burns et al
as 3:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Enio DaSilva, Jr.
Defendant:
Esquire Stephen D. Burns, Brad Ellis Hawkins and Moen Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abbott et al v. Gerber Products Company
as 1:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
rebecca abbott, Erin Abdoo, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
