Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw, Officer Felski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Felske Hawkins, Cpt Kyle Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
Tyron DeJay Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Friend et al
as 2:2020cv01719
Defendant:
Racine County Health Department, Lt Luther, Racine County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl S Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adell v. Waupun Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv01617
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Pusich, Sgt Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Adell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins, Joshua et al v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00352
Defendant:
Eau Claire County, Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc. and Community Transition Center
Plaintiff:
Tyler Moe, Phillip Geissler and Joshua Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Barr et al
as 2:2019cv00748
Defendant:
Sgt Hawkins, Capt Boisen, Lt Tom and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Kemper
as 1:2017cv00774
Petitioner:
Michael Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
Paul Kemper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Robert J Hawkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hawkins v. Strahota et al
as 2:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Hawkins
Defendant:
Donald Strahota , William Pollard, Belinda Schrubbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
