Cases 1 - 10 of 1,239
Michael Hayes v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 24-11434
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HAYES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Hayes v. Topgolf USA Birmingham LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Brooke Hayes
Defendant:
TopGolf USA Birmingham LLC and Top Golf USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ermine Hayes v. Director, OWCP, et al
as 24-11260
Petitioner:
ERMINE HAYES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD and DIRECTOR, OWCP
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cheron Hayes v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11229
Plaintiff:
CHERON HAYES
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and DISNEY GIFT CARD SERVICES, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
USA v. Chellena Hayes
as 24-11174
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHELLENA ARNETTA HAYES
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10024
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
