Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Fernandez v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
George A Fernandez
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail Director, Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Thoresons et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Trivon Devele Wilson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Division of Adult Institutions, Milwaukee House of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Lloyd v. Stoner et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hayes and Lloyd D. Hayes
Defendant:
Stoner, Heidi, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley, Philip v. Cromwell et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Philip Hawley
Defendant:
Warden Cromwell, Kevin Carr, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50011
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
N.P. Mershon, Nurse Hayes, Ms. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Stevens et al
as 2:2023cv01563
Petitioner:
Derrick Watkins
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens, Dept of Correction, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evangelista, Wayne v. Crocker, Stephen et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Wayne Richard Evangelista and Wayne R. Nance, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen L. Crocker, Kim V. Gaffney, Kalvin D. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
