Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Taylor v. Warden, Tomoka Correctional Institution
as 6:2023cv02435
Petitioner:
John Henry Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Tomoka Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00439
Petitioner:
Carlos Clemente Henry Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clemente v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00540
Petitioner:
Henry Taylor Carlos Clemente
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Whittington et al
as 5:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Taylor Jr and Charles Henry Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Gates, Police Jury Bossier Parish, Jason Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. McLaughlin
as 1:2018cv03986
Petitioner:
Henry Taylor
Respondent:
Warden Gregory McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. McLaughlin
as 4:2018cv00193
Petitioner:
Henry Taylor
Respondent:
Warden Gregory McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00558
Defendant:
Nathaniel Johnson, Jonathan London and Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Henry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. McGhaney et al
as 2:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Henry Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
D McGhaney, R Gailard, C Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Taylor, Jr. v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 14-13427
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN HENRY TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and WARDEN
TAYLOR v. CREWS
as 5:2013cv00243
Petitioner:
JOHN HENRY TAYLOR, JR
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
