Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Morales v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-536
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO MORALES, as an individual and on behalf of others similarly situated
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
ACTIV ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, formerly known as Doe 2, AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., formerly known as Doe 1 and others
Morales v. MTLR Corp et al
as 1:2023cv10712
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Morales
Defendant:
MTLR Corp d/b/a/ Mendon Truck Leasing & Rental, Ronel Sylveus, Imperial Bag and Paper Co, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Heriberto Morales v. Activ Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05943
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Morales
Defendant:
Activ Enterprises, LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MORALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21819
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERIBERTO MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORALES v. WEATHERS
as 4:2018cv00273
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO MORALES
Respondent:
WEATHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santiago Morales Guerrero v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2958
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO HERIBERTO MORALES GUERRERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morales v. 75th Precinct
as 17-1175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Heriberto Morales
Defendant - Appellee:
75th Precinct
Morales v. 75th Precinct
as 1:2017cv00298
Defendant:
75th Precinct
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2017cv20008
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Morales
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
