Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
House v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv06059
Plaintiff:
Melvon House
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department and Officer (FNU) Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Taylor v. North County Police Cooperative et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Demario Taylor
Defendant:
North County Police Cooperative, City of Dellwood, City of Pine Lawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garmon v. City of Northwoods, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Charles Garmon
Defendant:
City of Northwoods, Missouri, Samuel Davis and Michael Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Irby Construction Company
as 4:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Chelsa Hill
Defendant:
Irby Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Varela et al v. Hill et al
as 4:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Varela and Claudia Varela
Defendant:
William Harold Hill, City of Wildwood, St. Louis County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Naucke v. City of Park Hills, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Charles Naucke
Defendant:
City of Park Hills, Missouri and Mayor Pro-Tem Stacey Easter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
