Cases 1 - 10 of 785
Procter v. Farmington Hills Police Department
as 2:2024cv11520
Plaintiff:
Clark Procter
Defendant:
Farmington Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurst v. Auburn Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv11522
Plaintiff:
Arnold Hurst
Defendant:
Auburn Hills Police Department, Moore and Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Provident Asset Management LLC
as 5:2024cv11500
Plaintiff:
Spring Hill
Defendant:
Provident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Tupelo Real Estate Investments, Inc. et al v. Randall et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Tupelo Real Estate Investments, Inc., WISL Investments, Inc. and LTC Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher C. Randall, Janelle D Randall, Charles E. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Listerman v. Notting Hill LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10868
Plaintiff:
Anne Listerman
Defendant:
Notting Hill LLC, CVS Health Corporation and Woodward Detroit CVS L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young et al v. BMG LoansAtWork, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10758
Plaintiff:
Chareese Young, Traci Ross and Traci Hill
Defendant:
BMG LoansAtWork, LLC, BMG Money, Inc. and EGL US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Nessel v. Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
