Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Mohan v. Perez et al
as 2:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Prashant Mohan
Defendant:
Nicolas E Perez doing business as NMP Auto, Moyes Auto & Marine Wholesale LLC, Michael Moyes and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Holcomb v. Taskus USA LLC
as 2:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith Holcomb
Defendant:
Taskus USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B Garland, Mary Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Holcomb v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03791
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tamara Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Renee Holcomb
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb #091014 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00379
Petitioner:
Kent Return Holcomb
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valles v. Columbia West Capital et al
as 2:2015cv01587
Plaintiff:
Angel M Valles
Defendant:
Columbia West Capital, Source Capital Group, Lobodos Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv08031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
