Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Asbell v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dale L. Asbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Anna Valentine, Philip Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Board of Education of Crittenden County Schools et al
as 5:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wood
Defendant:
Board of Education of Crittenden County Schools and Laurie Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Smith v. Melvin et al
as 7:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Duff, Garza, James Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton et al v. Kolb et al
as 3:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Sheri Bruner, Jeremy Holcomb, Stacey Bruner and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Horton and Jason Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Safelite Group, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Clarence Holcomb
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Holcomb v. Osage Estates Apartments et al
as 3:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Glenda Holcomb
Defendant:
Osage Estates Apartments, L.E.A. Properties, Beacon Property Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Kleiman v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Kleiman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Local Union #100, IBT , Fareed Koury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kleiman v. Hurley et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Kleiman
Defendant:
John Hurley , Troy Stapleton , Mark Overberg and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Camp v. Haas et al
as 3:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Aaron Camp and Aaron Camp
Defendant:
Scott Haas, John Rees, Paige McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
