Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sivak v. Silverman, et al.
as 26-3110
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CIRCUIT JUDGE, RICHARD A. PAEZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE and HOLLY A. THOMAS, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Paez, et al.
as 26-3111
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
RICHARD A. PAEZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE and HOLLY A. THOMAS, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Silverman, et al.
as 26-2727
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CIRCUIT JUDGE, RICHARD A. PAEZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE and HOLLY A. THOMAS, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Silverman, et al.
as 1:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Barry G. Silverman, Richard A. Paez and Holly A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Paez, et al.
as 1:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Richard A. Paez and Holly A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Silverman, et al.
as 1:2026cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Barry G. Silverman, Richard A. Paez and Holly A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4094
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4016
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Alphabet Inc., Cox Communication Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05295
Plaintiff:
Holly Renee Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
