Cases 31 - 40 of 303
SHAFFER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00459
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, DEBBIE OXLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
RANDY J HARMON, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, HODGES, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2018cv00168
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Patti Sneed, Belinda Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00133
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, GENERAL COUNSEL ROBERT E JONES, MICHAEL L KARPF and others
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCERO et al v. SHEPARD et al
as 5:2018cv00228
Defendant:
RANDY BROWN, DANIEL FASS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
DINA INES ESTRADA MADRID and ESTATE OF JIMMY LUCERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobuary v. Bryson et al
as 3:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jason Darius Mobuary
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Georgia Correctional Healthcare and John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
