Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandy v. The State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
BAYARDO RENO SANDY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF COLORADO, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Hopkins v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
James E Hopkins
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hopkins v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Erin Hopkins
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. and Matrix Absence Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Hopkins v. Russell et al
as 2:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Ralph L. Hopkins
Defendant:
Gregory Russell and Wagner Equipment Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States v. Hopkins
as 22-5090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANDRE ANTONIO HOPKINS
Riley (ID 52926) v. Skidmore et al
as 5:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Martin Arnold Riley
Defendant:
(fnu) Skidmore, (fnu) Hopkins, (fnu) East and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Favors v. Hopkins County Jail
as 1:2022cv01610
Plaintiff:
April Favors
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandy v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv00413
Defendant:
Jane E. Brooks, Jane (I) E. Brooks, State of Colorado, The and others
Plaintiff:
Bayardo Reno Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cline v. Seal et al
as 5:2022cv04009
Plaintiff:
Cory Deshawn Cline
Defendant:
Andrew Seal, Chad Cowher, Dylan Passinese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
