Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Carr et al
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Taylor
Defendant:
Christopher Carr, Paul Howard, Jr., Todd Markle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
RODERICK FRANK FOSTER
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, SAMUEL S OLENS, HOWARD Z SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Taylor
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Howard Z. Simms, Samuel S. Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. XANDERS et al
as 5:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SMITH
Defendant:
SAM XANDERS, STATE OF GEORGIA, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INMAN v. STATE BAR OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L INMAN
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, WILLIAM P SMITH, III, ROBERT E MCCORMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, HOWARD Z SIMMS and MARTHA C CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPILLERS v. CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
HAROLD SPILLERS
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA , HOWARD Z SIMMS , KERRY DUNAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Simms et al
as 5:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Sok Kyom Thomas
Defendant:
Howard Z. Simms, John Carlton Cook and Martha C. Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
