Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Leatherby v. Yalobusha County et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Leatherby
Defendant:
Yalobusha County, Amy F. McMinn, Yalobusha County Sherifs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Howell et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Reed Howell, Trace Carlock, Vicki Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leatherby v Howel
as 3:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tim Leatherby
Defendant:
Judge Howel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Gammage et al
as 4:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Edwin Merriman, Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. doing business as AMR and American Medical Response, Justin Gammage and others
Plaintiff:
Rika Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. City of Corinth et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Sammy Brown and Brian Keith Howell
Defendant:
City of Corinth and John C. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Lee County, Miss. et al
as 1:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Kermit O. Rogers
Defendant:
Lee County, Miss., City of Tupelo, Miss., Jim H. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neilson v. Greenlee et al
as 3:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Philip Halbert Neilson
Defendant:
James Greenlee, Matthew Bulwinkel, Michael Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivens et al v. Forrest County et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bivens , Larry Ruffin , Bobby Ray Dixon and others
Defendant:
Forrest County , City of Hattiesburg , Raymond Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
