Cases 31 - 40 of 157
Joyce Ulrich v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 5:2017cv01107
Defendant:
Does, Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ulrich
Rodgers v Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 3:2017cv05348
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Rodgers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Rodgers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witt et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 4:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Patton Witt and Annie Witt
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tabbert v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tabbert
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Microport Orthopedics Inc and Rocky Mountain Medical Distributors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tabbert v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 2:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tabbert
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Microport Orthopedics Inc and Rocky Mountain Medical Distributors Inc
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Tabbert v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 2:2016mc00169
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tabbert
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Microport Orthopedics Inc and Rocky Mountain Medical Distributors Inc
Heiss v. Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Robert Heiss
Defendant:
Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp and John/Jane Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasuwl v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv02201
Plaintiff:
Almalik Rasuwl
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp , Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Sarkisian et al
as 4:2016cv05079
Plaintiff:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and Golden State Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
