Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Brandenburg v. County of Hubbard et al
as 0:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
David O Brandenburg and David Brandenburg
Defendant:
Hubbard County Minnesota, Scott Williams, Craig Kritzeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nile Hubbard
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Lt. Duffy, Sgt. Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hubbard and Ruth Hubbard
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locke v. County of Hubbard et al
as 0:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes and Scott Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nile Hubbard
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheadrick et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Sheadrick, Alfred Twyman, Michael O'bannon and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Traylor v. Hennepin County Sheriffs Office et al
as 0:2022cv02788
Plaintiff:
Rayco Traylor
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriffs Office, Hennepin Health Care, Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Beltz
as 0:2021cv00982
Respondent:
Tracey Beltz
Petitioner:
Eddie Niles Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hubbard v. Beltz
as 0:2020cv02622
Respondent:
Tracey Beltz
Petitioner:
Eddie Niles Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
