Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hug v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11878
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hug
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUG v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv03091
Petitioner:
DONALD F HUG, II
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUG v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2022cv00286
Petitioner:
DONALD F HUG, II
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hug v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv21648
Plaintiff:
Ryan T. Hug
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Marlene Hernandez, M.D., Kalem Santiago, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Hug v. Dixon et al
as 1:2022cv21647
Plaintiff:
Ryan T. Hug
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Marlene Hernandez, M.D., Kalem Santiago, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
King v. Canaccord Genuity et al
as 1:2021cv24108
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
Canaccord Genuity, Haywood Securites, Graham Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
King v. Canaccord Genuity et al
as 1:2021cv23841
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
Canaccord Genuity, Graham Saunders, Spiro Kletas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STRONG v. DYKES et al
as 3:2019cv04814
Defendant:
DICE, KELLY, EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenzo S.A. v. 1one2two3three et al
as 0:2016cv63030
Defendant:
1one2two3three, Lindatson, ANTO NIOE SPARZA and others
Plaintiff:
Kenzo S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
