Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. Chen et al
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Shu Chen, Yong Hui Chen and Green Emerald Paradise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hampton v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Rayzon Hampton
Defendant:
Ok Hui Gutierrez, Victor Gutierrez, Eagle Event Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ditmore v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Ditmore
Defendant:
Ok Hui Gutierrez, Victor Gutierrez, Eagle Event Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agrawal v. Wang
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Hui Wang and Elson Wang
Plaintiff:
Anil K Agrawal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Music City Metals Co., Inc. v. Cai et al
as 3:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Music City Metals Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Jingchang Cai, Yin Hailin, Highot Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Martichuski et al v. Wu et al [TV2]
as 3:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
John Martichuski and JMI, Inc.
Defendant:
David Hui Wu, Bobby Chen Sabas and Hospitality International Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conway v. Superdock et al
as 2:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Leslie N Conway
Defendant:
Yong Hui Kim Superdock , Gregory Godfrey Randol and New Light Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conway et al v. Superdock et al
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Darlene Conway and Berry Conway
Defendant:
Yong Hui Kim Superdock , Gregory Godfrey Randol, New Light Logistics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
