Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The Travelers Indemnity Company v. He
as 2:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company and The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Xinnian He and Hui He
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Xiannian He and Hui He
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Chen v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01492
Plaintiff:
Huy-Ying Chen
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office and Hugo R Esparza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chen et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2018cv01269
Plaintiff:
Huy-Ying Chen and Yueh Hua Chen
Defendant:
John Doe, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, Janaya L Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen et al v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2018cv05204
Plaintiff:
Qi Wen Chen , Edison Zheng , Yu Kin Zheng and others
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County and Grays Harbor County Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tran v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00323
Petitioner:
Huy V Tran
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Acosta v New Main Chinese Buffet Inc, et al
as 3:2017cv06030
Defendant:
Ocean Sushi, Inc. dba Mika Japanese Buffet, New Main Chinese Buffet at Lacey, LLC dba Main Chinese Buffet, Hui Ru Dong and others
Plaintiff:
Secty of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
