Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shields v. Haarslev, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00426
Defendant:
Haarslev, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Shields
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Haarslev, Inc. v. Muir et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Defendant:
JLM Management, LLC and Jeff Muir
Plaintiff:
Haarslev, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Haarslev, Inc. v. Christensen Machine, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
Haarslev, Inc.
Defendant:
christensen machine, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Haarslev, Inc. v. Muir et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02567
Plaintiff:
Haarslev, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeff Muir and JLM Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Haarslev, Inc. v. Tom's Metal Enterprises, LLC
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
Haarslev, Inc.
Defendant:
Tom's Metal Enterprises doing business as Industrial Metal Enterprises, LLC, Tom's Metal Enterprises, LLC doing business as Industrial Metal Enterprises, LLC also known as IME and IME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Haarslev, Inc. v. Nissen et al
as 5:2019cv06128
Defendant:
Hans-Henrik Nissen, Claus Oestergaard Nielsen and Oestergaard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Haarslev, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.