Cases 1 - 10 of 276
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Howard, et al. v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 24-1384
Petitioner:
TRACY HOWARD, ADINA RINGLER and TRECEE ARTIS
Respondent:
THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
Sawyer v. Breglio et al
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sawyer
Defendant:
John Breglio, Kathryn Bregman, David Clossey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Mark Haines
as 24-6099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK DANIEL HAINES
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10748
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC;, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Mosley v. Hain Celestial Group Inc et al
as WAW/3:23-CV-06176
Plaintiff:
Mosley and Jewel Mosley
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group Inc, Nurture Inc, Danone SA and others
Clark v. Hain Celestial Group Incorporated et al
as AZ/2:23-CV-02607
Plaintiff:
Clark and Shawntilea Clark
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group Incorporated, Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company and others
Watkins, et al. v. Nurture, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023mc00321
In Re:
Subpoena to Non-Party Jessica Rolph
Plaintiff:
Margaret Watkins and James D Watkins
Defendant:
Nurture, LLC, Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Amazon.Com Services, LLC and others
D. S. v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:23-CV-10193
Plaintiff:
D. S.
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc, Hain Celestial Group Inc., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
