Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Swinson v. Hubbell Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
Hubbell Incorporated, Kristen Thomure, Jamie Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Swinson v. IUE-CWA Local 86821 et al
as 2:2023cv04230
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
IUE-CWA Local 86821, Jessie Montgomery, Hubbell Power Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00129
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katesha Smith and Miranda Fogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06059
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Hammock v. Haines et al
as 6:2015cv03091
Plaintiff:
Teddy Joe Hammock, II
Defendant:
Ben Haines, Brown, Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doran et al v. Forever Grand Vacations, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv03118
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Doran and Barbara Doran
Defendant:
Forever Grand Vacations, LLC , Randy Parker , Billy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. Howell County Jail Staff et al
as 6:2012cv03377
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Haines
Defendant:
Howell County Jail Staff and Howell County, MO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haines v. Howell County Jail
as 6:2012cv03282
Plaintiff:
James C Haines
Defendant:
Howell County Jail Staff and Howell County, MO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Vescovo et al
as 4:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Brooks
Defendant:
Paul Vescovo, Haines, Larry Pace and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
