Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Mosley v. Hain Celestial Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv06176
Plaintiff:
Jewel Mosley
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc, Nurture, Inc., Danone S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demos v. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Avril Haines, William Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Wilson et al
as 3:2022cv05628
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Heather Wilson, Brittany Botsel, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Cowlitz County Clerks et al
as 3:2022cv05240
Petitioner:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Respondent:
Cowlitz County Clerks, Cowlitz County Prosecutors, Ron Hains and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphreys v. Lystad et al
as 3:2021cv05878
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
E Lystad, Denece Brewer, Heather Willson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haines v. City of Centralia et al
as 3:2020cv05576
Defendant:
City of Centralia, Centralia Police Department, Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Irby v. Haines
as 2:2017cv00180
Petitioner:
Terrance Jon Irby
Respondent:
Ron Haines and Attorney General for the State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irby v. Haines et al
as 2:2017cv00133
Petitioner:
Terrance Jon Irby
Respondent:
Haines and Attorney General for the State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Irby v. Guidry et al
as 3:2017cv05070
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jon Irby
Defendant:
Guidry, Haines, Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
