Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Chappell v. Haley
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
Matt Haley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haley v. Brewer et al
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Russell Francis Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer and Eddie Rogers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Brewer
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, John Doe, Haley Barbour and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. BRYANT et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barbour and Roger Wruck
Plaintiff:
Solomon S. Kennedy and Soloman S. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Supt. Emmitt L. Sparkman, Roger Wruck and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Haley v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grady v. Climons et al
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vashon Grady
Defendant:
Lindsay Climons, Steve Wallice, Donna Sue Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
