Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Hammonds v. Baron et al
as 2:2023cv10245
Plaintiff:
Billy Hammonds
Defendant:
Baron, Fuller and Guestella
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Hammond #670336 v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dannel Christopher Hammond #670336
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Erica Huss, Unknown Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond Jr. #193821 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00215
Petitioner:
Tracy Cecil Hammond #193821, Jr.
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson #857142 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Demario Johnson #857142, Teywon Beckham #595348, Marcus Howell #872975 and others
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #267009 et al v. Schiebner et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009, Eddie Ryan Lewis #616302, Joseph Ambrose #185357 and others
Respondent:
James Schiebner, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hammonds #611668 v. Burton
as 1:2020cv00592
Respondent:
DeWayne Burton
Petitioner:
Billy Hammonds #611668
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peglow #215216 v. Alfrey et al
as 1:2018cv00573
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peglow #215216
Defendant:
Joan Alfrey, Meredith J. Hammond, Kevin D. Corning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peglow v. Alfrey et al
as 2:2018cv11426
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peglow
Defendant:
Joan Alfrey, Meredith J. Hammond, Kevin D. Corning and others
Syzak #215189 v. Lindhost et al
as 1:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Scott Syzak #215189
Defendant:
Unknown Lindhost, Meredith Hammond, Joan Alfeay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
