Cases 51 - 60 of 144
Hammonds v. Long et al
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Mike Dobbins and Jeff Long
Plaintiff:
Robert Hammonds, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nally v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Respondent:
Jim Hammond, James Woodruff and Chuck Smith
Petitioner:
Paul L Nally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Haslam et al
as 1:2018cv00170
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Jim Hammond, Herbert Slatery and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erling Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Hammond et al
as 1:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Parham
Defendant:
Jim Hammond , Zachary Casteel , Jacob Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elsea v. Hammond et al
as 1:2017cv00176
Defendant:
Jim Hammond , Hamilton County and Unknown Jailers of the Hamilton County Jail
Plaintiff:
Roy Lyonell Elsea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk v. Anderson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jason C Monk
Defendant:
Anderson, Smith, Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackwell v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
George Jackson Blackwell
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail and Jim Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs et al v. State of Tennessee et al (JRG2)
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr., Adria P. Gibbs-Hines, Myra A. Collier and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Hamilton County, Hamilton County Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv01299
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hammond
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brumlow v. Hamilton County et al (RLJ2)
as 1:2016cv00394
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee , Hamilton County Sheriff's Department , Jim Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Brumlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
