Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Donald Parker v. C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Braswell v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 24-6138
Plaintiff:
DANNY EARL BRASWELL
Defendant:
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL, LIEUTENANT STEVEN PHILLIPS, B. BROWN, Records/Classification Department and others
Alonzo Tucker v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 23-6801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALONZO Q. TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Rogers, Lt. Jones, Col. Vergakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Q. Tucker
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Cunningham
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail and Wellpath Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jacob Carlson
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 3:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jacob Robert James Carlson
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
