Cases 31 - 40 of 75
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Allen et al
as 1:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.)
Defendant:
Ursula C. Allen and Carla L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Bank v. Yance
as 1:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
James Yance, Jr. and Yance Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock v. Wal-mart Associates Inc
as 6:2013cv01939
Plaintiff:
Diane Hancock
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hancock v. Estes
as 2:2013cv00146
Petitioner:
David Hancock
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock Bank v. 13 Upham Street, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
13 Upham Street, LLC, Robert V. Dzwonkowski, Joseph H. L. Dzwonkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daryl Edwin Smith Irrevocable Trust et al v. PNC Mortgage
as 3:2012cv01085
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Daryl Edwin Smith Irrevocable Trust , William Van Jacoway , Daryl Edwin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hancock Bank v. Miles et al
as 1:2012cv00642
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Richard D. Miles and Vanessa T. Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
