Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Hininger et al
as 1:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Dr. f/n/u Hancock, John Doe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Hancock County Jail et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Martin Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Jail and Brad Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hancock County Sheriff Department (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Marty Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Hininger et al
as 3:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Dr. f/n/u Hancock and John Doe, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Hancock Co Sherif Dept et al
as 3:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Sammy Russell
Defendant:
Roxie, Cole Setsor, Zackery Thorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock et al v. Rowland et al
as 1:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Cavayah Hancock, Steven Ralston and Justice Buchanan
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Debra Wagonshutz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Hancock County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Lawson
Defendant:
Hancock County Jail, Leamon Maxey and Cathy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Hancock County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Billy Burton Blair, Jr
Defendant:
Hancock County Sheriffs Office, Leman Maxey and Miranda Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. USA
as 2:2013cv00252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John T Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
