Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v GILES et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
THOMAS P GILES, TAE JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v. MADRIGAL et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
Francisco Madrigal, Thomas P. Giles, Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00224
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Go v. Board of Regents for the University System of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv03233
Plaintiff:
Calvin Go
Defendant:
Augusta University, Board of Regents for the University System of Georgia, Dr. Nancy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Philip Hanes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIVINS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
WILLIE SAM BIVINS
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, OSTANDER, BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Shepard et al
as 1:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Rashad Khadijah Arnold
Defendant:
Stan Shepard, T. Bussey, Stanley Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanes Companies, Inc. v. The Erosion Company, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02461
Plaintiff:
Hanes Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
The Erosion Company, Inc.
Wimberly v. Sproul et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Henry James Wimberly, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Sproul, Major Haggerty, RICK HANES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
