Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Advance Colorado, et al v. Griswold, et al
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADVANCE COLORADO, a Colorado non-profit, GEORGE HANKS BROWN, "Hank", an individual, STEVEN WARD, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JENA GRISWOLD, in official capacity as Secretary of State of Colorado and JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado
Vreeland v. Vigil, et al
as 21-1052
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR MAUL, ANDREW RINGEL, CARLEY DAVIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Vigil, et al
as 20-1302
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW RINGEL, MAUL, CARLEY DAVIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Lyons Calvin v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 17-6083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANESSA G. LYONS CALVIN, Daughter, Trustee & Executor of The Jimmie Lyons & Mercy D. Lyons Irrevocalbe Trust Dated 1991 LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Office of the Attorney General, DISTRICT OF COMANCHE COUNTY DISTRICT #5 FRED SMITH, D.A., JUDGE GERALD F. NEUWIRTH and others
James v. Valdez, et al
as 15-2062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ERIC JAMES
Defendant - Appellant:
VICENTE "JOHNNY" VALDEZ, TONY MACE, JR., HANK GOKE and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 11-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, TETON COUNTY, HANK PHIBBS and others
Hopkins v. Galetka
as 09-4212
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY C. HOPKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
HANK GALETKA
Hopkins v. Galetka
as 09-4109
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY C. HOPKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
HANK GALETKA
Gardner v. Galetka
as 07-4104
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE LEE GARDNER
Respondent - Appellee:
HANK GALETKA, Warden, of the Utah State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
