Cases 31 - 40 of 75
CRAIG v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00004
Petitioner:
LARRY CRAIG
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2012cv01806
Plaintiff:
KENDALE L. ADAMS, MARTA E. BELL, VINCENT C. BURKE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPPEL v. HANKS
as 1:2012cv01809
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CHAPPEL
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. HANKS
as 2:2012cv00345
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER G. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAUGHN v. HANKS
as 1:2012cv01578
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOBSON v. HANKS
as 1:2012cv01561
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
EDWARD HOBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2012cv00049
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY R. JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Stricken As A Co-respondent Per Order Of 3/22/11:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER
Respondent:
DEPUTY SUPT. CRAIG A. HANKS SR.
Petitioner:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. HANKS
as 2:2011cv00052
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN and CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ERNEST TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
