Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cunningham v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Charles Mitchell, Eastern Legal Services, Paul Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Hanks v. Radcliffe-Walker
as 3:2015cv00729
Petitioner:
Winsten A. Hanks
Respondent:
Radcliffe-Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Tonita Louise Hall
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Eric Holder, Albert L. Lord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Lord et al
as 1:2012cv01037
Plaintiff:
Tonita Louise Hall
Defendant:
Albert L. Lord, Debra Wiley, John Frey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hardister et al v. Charles H. Helmick Well & Pump Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Hank A. Hardister , Justin W. Moore and William N. Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles H. Helmick Well & Pump Services, Inc., Ronnie Helmick Well & Pump Service, Inc., Charles H. Helmick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hanks v. WAVY Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00439
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Hanks
Defendant:
WAVY Broadcasting, LLC and LIN Television Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanks v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Isha Denise Hanks
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Norfolk City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 1:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
Isha Denise Hanks
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Wright
as 3:2007cv00020
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dean Hanks
Respondent:
Ed Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
