Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burk v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Burk
Defendant:
Superintendent Wakefield, Corrections Officer Cassol, Corrections Officer Hann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYER et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv12393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TARBY, MANUEL DIAZ, GLENN JONES and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk v. Lang et al
as 1:2020cv02179
Defendant:
Mr. Verone, Ms. Grassmyer, D. Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Ail Burk, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Ellenberger et al
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Hann and S. Ellenberger
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jevon Everett v. Hann, et al
as 17-2673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEVON A. EVERETT
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O HANN, C/O RODGER, SGT PIERCE and others
Van De Gejuchte v. PrimeCare et al
as 3:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Van De Gejuchte
Defendant:
PrimeCare , Debrah Willson , Tara Hann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIENIAWA v. SOMMERS et al
as 5:2015cv02999
Defendant:
CAROLE SOMMERS, LT. GLOSE, LT. THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
JASON CIENIAWA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANN v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2014cv03752
Plaintiff:
DARRELL K. HANN
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, SEVERAL NEW JERSEY DOC LOCATIONS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Mitchell v. Twp of Pemberton, et al
as 09-2902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
PEMBERTON TWP, DAVID A. PATRIARCA, RICHARD PRICKETTE and others
MITCHELL v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON et al
as 1:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON, DAVID A. PATRIARCA, RICHARD PRICKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
