Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WHITE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03270
Plaintiff:
HARDY WHITE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pace v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Randy Camden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sebastian v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sebastian
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Randy Camden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Bullock et al
as 4:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Jamie Crump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Bullock et al
as 4:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean, Aaron Sebastian, Dakota Pace and others
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Randy Camden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sebastian et al v. Foot et al
as 4:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sebastian, Kelly McSean and Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pirtle v. Bullock et al
as 4:2018cv02101
Defendant:
Ray Foot, Trent Franklin, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ray Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Smith et al
as 4:2018cv00821
Plaintiff:
Gastro Domonique Dennis
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, Hardy White and Heather Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
