Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bode v. Fairview City of The et al
as 5:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
William Shane Bode
Defendant:
Fairview The City of, Steve Tanio, Philip Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hargrove v. Bach Team, LLC
as 4:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Courtney Hargrove
Defendant:
Bach Team, LLC and Bach Team, LLC doing business as Foursite Property Management doing business as Steeplechase Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hollins v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
Chryshon Hollins
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, Kendrix Burns, Anthony Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beasley v. Hargrove et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dayton Beasley
Defendant:
Michael Hargrove and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
