Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Brown v. Lappin et al
as 4:2009cv01898
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Brown
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lappin et al
as 3:2009cv01732
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, B.A. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BERARDI v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00137
Petitioner:
JOHN BERARDI
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PATEL v. WARDEN ZENK et al
as 3:2008cv00251
Petitioner:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Respondent:
WARDEN ZENK, CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PATEL v. ZENK et al
as 3:2008cv00249
Petitioner:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZENK and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Forsythe v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01932
Petitioner:
Brian Forsythe
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hart v. Whalen et al
as 3:2008cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jamal Hart
Defendant:
Walter Whalen, Barry Stahl, R. Scandle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Levi v. Lappin et al
as 1:2007cv01839
Plaintiff:
Bernard S. Levi
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Scott Dodrill, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAZZOLI v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2007cv02968
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Us Parole Commission, DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
