Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Spinks v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv03184
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brennen Spinks and Brennen Spinks
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Mr. David C Greene, Carolyn J. Scruggs and others
Interested Party:
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ayers et al v. Ciox Health, LLC
as 1:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
Earl Ayers and Melissa Harmon
Defendant:
Ciox Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bell v. Trentzch et al
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
Johnathan Trentzch, Jeffrey Hartman, Lt. Rosay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Sgt. Gouff, Lt. Keplinger, Lt. Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Seat Pleasant Police Department et al
as 8:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
Iyanna Anderson
Defendant:
Seat Pleasant Police Department, State of Maryland, Heyward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Scott v. Harmon et al
as 1:2022cv00861
Petitioner:
Luketirice Scott
Respondent:
Carroll Harmon and Annie Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaur v. Green et al
as 1:2021cv01780
Petitioner:
Raminder Kaur
Respondent:
Robert L Green and Carol Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amos, Jr. v. Shevchenko et al
as 1:2021cv01641
Plaintiff:
Harmon J Amos, Jr.
Defendant:
MCVL Group, Inc. and Kirill A Shevchenko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02346
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Munsel Harmon
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Turner v. Harmon et al
as 1:2020cv02328
Plaintiff:
James E. Turner
Defendant:
H & M Bay, Inc., Omar P. Harmon, II and Omar P. Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
