Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TERRELL v. SEALS et al
as 5:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN SEALS, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERTS et al
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HELEN ROBERTS, TONY COTNEY, TOMMY COTNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
RAVAN v. TALTON et al
as 5:2019cv00161
Defendant:
DEPUTY HARMON, DEPUTY GARY HEBERLY, DEPUTY CRAIG PEIRCE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN STEPHEN RAVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRIEST IRRIGATION LLC FKA UNITED IRRIGATION SUPPLY LLC v. HIERS et al
as 7:2018cv00155
Defendant:
DONALD VANCE HIERS, SR, UNITED IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC., SANTIAGO LEDESMA, III and others
Plaintiff:
TRIEST IRRIGATION LLC FKA UNITED IRRIGATION SUPPLY LLC and TRIEST IRRIGATION LLC
CARSWELL v. CONLEY et al
as 5:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON CARSWELL
Defendant:
T J CONLEY, DONALD BARROW, MICHAEL ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. HARMON et al
as 5:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS, III
Defendant:
JEROME HARMON, MICHAEL GILBERT, MARTIN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYKSMA et al v. PIERSON et al
as 4:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
GREG DYKSMA , TAMMY DYKSMA and THE ESTATE OF NICHOLAS DYKSMA
Defendant:
TOMMY PIERSON, JOE HARMON, HEATH DAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moss v. Harmon et al
as 5:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Henry Marvin Moss
Defendant:
Sgt Harmon and Ofc Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Morales et al
as 1:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
John T. Harmon
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Christopher Williams and Anthony Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.