Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Smith v. McCuskey et al
as 3:2012cv03020
Plaintiff: Darnell M Smith
Defendant: Michael P McCuskey and Harold A Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Casino Arizona et al
as 2:2011cv02355
Plaintiff: Harold E Baker
Defendant: Casino Arizona, Tribal First Insurance and Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darnell M. Smith v. Harold A. Baker
as 11-3266
Petitioner: DARNELL M. SMITH
Respondent: HAROLD A. BAKER
BAKER v. AGUEA LINES
as 2:2011cv52462
Plaintiff: HAROLD L BAKER
Defendant: AGUEA LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BAKER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv52463
Plaintiff: HAROLD L BAKER
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
-E United Alloys Inc v. Baker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1993cv04722
Defendant: Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company The, Harold A Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Counter Claimant: Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Unknown: Peter M Roan, Peter M Roan, Peter M Roan and others
Cross Defendant: Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Cross Claimant: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Flask Chemical Corp, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co and others
Counter Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, Siskin Investment Co, United Alloys Inc and others
Special Master: Hon Harry R McCue
Plaintiff: United Alloys Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
In re: VPR Internationale
as 11-2257
Petitioner: VPR INTERNATIONALE
Respondent: HAROLD A. BAKER
Party-in-Interest: DOES 1-1,017
Darnell Smith v. Harold Baker
as 11-1439
Petitioner: DARNELL M. SMITH
Respondent: HAROLD A. BAKER
Smith v. Baker
as 3:2010cv03287
Plaintiff: Darnell M Smith
Defendant: Harold A Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Wilson v. Harold Baker
as 10-3478
Petitioner: LARRY D. WILSON
Respondent: HAROLD A. BAKER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?