Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Addleman et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr, Floyd Giles Squires, Terence Garry Field, Sr and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, Eldon Vail, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater et al v. Clarke et al
as 3:2010cv05822
Plaintiff:
Karen Slater , Beverly Jean Mauck , Allen Mauck and others
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, Kevin Burke, Richard Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv05516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lavine v. Clarke et al
as 3:2008cv05195
Plaintiff:
Bruce David Lavine
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, Belinda Stewart, Richard Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2007cv00414
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gardner
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Harold W Clarke, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Clarke et al
as 3:2007cv05602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Campbell
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, James E Thatcher and Clinton Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre v. Pacholke et al
as 2:2007cv01513
Petitioner:
Alan Scott Andre
Respondent:
Dan Pacholke and Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Clarke et al
as 2:2007cv00290
Plaintiff:
David Ramsey
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke and Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Secretary of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv05434
Plaintiff:
William Curry
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnier v. Clarke
as 2:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
Henry B Garnier, Jr
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
