Cases 11 - 20 of 878
Harper v. Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Harper
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Harper v. Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
as 4:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Hannah Harper
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Jackson HMA, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03128
Plaintiff:
Gloria Harper
Defendant:
Jackson HMA, LLC doing business as Merit Health Central and John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Edmond v. Winstead PC Law et al
as 3:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Rashawn Edmond, Derrick Edmond, Jordyn Phenice Edmond and others
Defendant:
Winstead PC Law, Experiant, Bellrock Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nobriga et al v. Mo's Chalet, Inc
as 2:2023cv06808
Plaintiff:
Denise Trilica, Rachel Koren, Tiffany Toth and others
Defendant:
Mo's Chalet, Inc doing business as Mo's Chalet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01603
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
